Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Can We Discuss Pockets? or, Beware Bad Revisionist History

About a week ago I saw this article floating around the interwebs: The Disturbing Reason Women's Clothing Historically Never Had Pockets.  

I admit, my first thought was "What an amusing bit of baseless, invented historical poppycock" wrote a "sigh, this is silly" Facebook post, had a nice chat and laugh with my history nerd friends, and moved on.

But I keep seeing this idea resurfacing.

People.

No.

First off, a quick lesson in "hmmmology"--when you see "always" or "never" in a historical context, say "hmmm."  Say "hmmmm" really loud and then question if it's true or not.  Minimal research will almost always debunk an absolute claim like this.  Quick lesson in hmmmology over.

But to the point, this article ignores, completely, the historical reality.  To keep this focused on what I know well and to avoid running into major overtime with this post, let's just focus on the ("long") 18th century.  And in this context, sure.  Women's *clothing* typically did not have pockets.

You know what they did instead?  Yeah, tied GIANT BAGS under their clothes.

Sometimes very prettily embroidered bags:



Or quilted:



Or colorful:



Even patchworked:

Though quite often plain:



And these separate pockets are not small.  Many of us chatting on my Facebook post originally ripping this article extolled the virtues of the pocket--how much we can fit into it, how they're often worn in pairs for EVEN MORE storage, how it's so convenient that, no matter how many outfits you have, you never have to transfer stuff out of one pocket into another, and you never have to worry over your handbag matching your outfit or occasion, because it's under your clothes.  It's harder to steal from you when your purse isn't on your arm but buried under gown and petticoat.

Some of the claims circulated about the "politicizing" of pockets and demonstrating how the lack of pockets translates to oppression of women point to Liberty in Transportable Stuff.  If a woman can't carry much, she can't be independent of a man.  Further, she can't tote around Dangerous Things like weapons or (gasp!) books, rendering her innocuous.

While you may not be able to tuck a pistol or a paperback into your itty bitty Kate Spade crossbody, you can certainly carry both in your 18th century pockets.  The hypotheses of both Liberty in Transportable Stuff and Dangerous Things fails in the face of evidence in the 18th century context.

(And we haven't even gotten into bags, baskets, market wallets, and other means of toting your flotsam, or the history of such items in eras when neither men's NOR women's clothing had built-in pockets.)

Beyond being made-up foolishness, this is bad revisionist history.  And that's a problem on a few levels.

First, and this is important, *revisionist history as a category is not a bad thing.*  Revision means, at its most basic, re-seeing, and there is plenty to re-see when we approach history.  Look, even the giants of historical research who came before a) missed stuff; b) focused on different stuff; and c) had their own prejudices about what they saw.  Contemporary historians are doing great work investigating, for example, groups of people who have been largely ignored, including women, the enslaved, and common soldiers, and are producing work that illuminates the past by seeing what wasn't looked at before. Re-see, re-evaluate, re-vise--completely valid process.  (Christina of On Living History reminded me of Through the Needle's Eye: Women's Work in the Age of Revolution, which is a great example.)

The problem as I see it is that craparticles like this are how most of the public enters the dialogue of revising history, and instead of seeing it as a worthwhile inquiry into filling in the gaps and correcting missteps that the study of history has left thus far, sees instead either a political rallying ground or a series of convenient fictions for said rallying ground. That's a shame, as it de-legitimizes in the public perception the good work done by plenty of current historians by association.

Any time that historical inquiry or argument begins not with the evidence but with an agenda, there are bound to be problems.  That's not how historical research or inquiry works.  You don't start with the mindset of "liberating," "politicizing," or generally making your audience more "woke" without prejudicing yourself against what the historical record actually provides you.  The process of writing can't begin with "how can I politicize historical clothing to further my contemporary agenda? How can I show how clothes, specifically when it comes to pockets, are tools of oppression?"  It has to begin with, instead, "What did historical people actually DO? What did they WEAR? How and in what variations?"  Then, please.  Interpret those facts to your heart's content and we can debate them--interpretation is still open to critique and debate, but it should be based, first, on the historical record itself.  In this case, that record involves the material culture and images of the past as well as text, and we have examples in droves to work with.

The short article linked above was a redux of a longer piece on Racked which does a better job actually acknowledging the history of the pocket in women's clothes.  There are disagreements aplenty to be made here (as a most basic example, the author's claim that separate pockets "disappeared" during the French Revolution when you can see examples that clearly survive the age of the guillotine by scrolling up on this post), but you can see a sharp difference between what historical argument that considers the evidence and argument that trims it out completely look like.  The focus of the piece on Racked is, in truth, much narrower--a (frankly a bit shoddy) attempt to cover earlier centuries quickly transitions into an examination of pockets and the late 19th century and 20th century women's advocacy movements--and here the author has enough historical evidence to posit an argument that women then saw pockets as tied to their personal liberty.

Does this prove a damn thing about 18th century women and pockets? Nope.  Does it provide ample reason for us to classify the early 19th century reticule as a tool of oppression? Nope (and the author should really not have tried).  Are there "always and never" statements to be made? Absolutely NOPE.  But it does provide an interesting historical context and conversation.  Exploring how women utilized and thought about the pockets in their clothing during a time of transitional thinking about women's rights? Re-seeing and re-evaluating history in a potentially productive way. (I say potentially because the piece is still short and quite incomplete, written, clearly, for a public rather than academic audience.)  Compare to "never had pockets=OPPRESSION!" as demonstrated above--huge difference.

8 comments:

Cassidy said...

No! It's still going around?? I wrote my takedown of thte Mic/Racked version a whole goshdarn year ago!

Rowenna said...

Cassidy, going around like a bad flu, lol. I think new "redux" articles picked up on the original (like the virus mutated...)

Love your takedown!

Unknown said...



الخدمات المنزلية بمدينة الدمام من شركة تاج 0551844053 شركة مكافحة حشرات بالدمام
شركة تاج لمكافحة الحشرات بالدمام 0551844053 نمتلك افضل الادوات المثاليه افضل شركة مكافحة حشرات بالدمام شركتنا اعتمدت على توفير افضل انواع المواد الخام والتى تستخدم خصيصا فى مجال مكافحة الحشرات بالدمام لذا سيطرات واستحوذت شركة تاج على كمية كبيرة من العملاء المميزين وذلك بفضل ثقة واطمئنان عملائنا الكرام فى الخدمات المقدمة من شركتهم الشركة الافضل بالدمام فى مجال رش المبيدات ومكافحة الحشرات
شركة رش مبيدات بالدمام
شركة عزل اسطح بالدمام
شركة مكافحة الحمام بالدمام والخبر
شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بالدمام
شركة مكافحة فئران بالدمام
شركة تنظيف بالدمام تاج المثالية
شركة مكافحة حشرات بسيهات
شركة مكافحة حشرات ببقيق
شركة تسليك مجارى بصفوى وسيهات وراس تنورة

Unknown said...



خدمات تنظيف بالدمام

شركة تسليك مجارى بالدمام شركة تاج لتسليك المجارى بالدمام 0551844053 تمتلك الشركة افضل الادوات المثاليه المستخدمه فى عمليات تسليك المجارى بالدمام والتى تمتلك الخبره الكافيه لذلك والتى تعتمد على عماله فنية مدربه على اعلى مستوى من الدقه والمهاره فى تنفيذ كل ما هو مطلوب من الطاقم المرسل اليك عزيزى العميل وذلك لتلبية جميع طلباتك عزيزى العميل كل ما عليك هو ان تبادر بالاتصال بشركة تاج
نقوم فى شركة تاج باستخدام افضل الاساليب العلميه الحديثه والطريقه المثاليه والصحيحه لعملية تسليك المجارى بالدمام نقوم بتسليك للحمامات بالدمام وتسليك صفايات الحمامات اثناء وجود تسليك وشركة تسليك مطابخ بالدمام من اوائل الشركات التى تعتمد على افضل الطرق الحديثه والتى تستخدمها شركة تاج 0551844053 التى اصبحت فى طليعة شركات التسليك بالدمام ولا تقل اهمية عن شركة طيوب وشركة المثالية لتسليك المجارى بالدمام
شركة تنظيف خزانات بالدمام
شركة تنظيف سجاد بالدمام
شركة تنظيف شقق بالدمام
شركة تنظيف فلل بالدمام
شركة تنظيف مجالس بالدمام
شركة تنظيف منازل بالدمام
شركة تنظيف واجهات زجاج بالدمام
شركة جلى بلاط ورخام وسيراميك بالدمام
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالدمام

Unknown said...


الخدمات المنزلية بمدينة القطيف من شركة تاج 0551844053 شركة تسليك مجارى بالقطيف
شركة تاج لتسليك المجارى بالقطيف 0551844053 والتى تعتمد على الخبرات والادوات المثالية اللازمه لعملية التسليك مع شركة تاج لتسليك المجارى سوف تتخلص من كل هذه الاضرار لاننا يوجد لدينا امهر العمال فى تسليك المجارى باحدث الاجهزة واقل التكاليف وخدمه ممتازة مقدمة على اعلى مستوى من الخبرة والمهارة والدقه العالية يسعدنا دائما ان نلبى رغبة عملائنا الكرام
ومن الخدمات المقدمة بمدينة القطيف ايضا ومنها :
شركة تنظيف بالقطيف
شركة تنظيف سجاد بالقطيف
شركة تنظيف شقق بالقطيف
شركة تنظيف فلل بالقطيف
شركة تنظيف مجالس بالقطيف
شركة تنظيف منازل بالقطيف
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالقطيف
شركة مكافحة النمل الابيض بالقطيف
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالقطيف

Clipping Path Service said...

I gotta bookmark this website it seems extremely helpful very useful. Thanks for sharing.

عبده العمراوى said...



شركة ورس لمكافحة الحشرات بالاحساء
شركة تنظيف موكيت بالجبيل

تاج للخدمات المنزلية said...



خدمات شركة ركن الامثل بالمنطقة الشرقيه 0502644550 وتقديم كافة الخدمات المنزلية

شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالاحساء
شركة تسليك مجارى بالخبر
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالخبر
شركة تسليك مجارى بالدمام
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالدمام
شركة تسليك مجارى بالقطيف
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالقطيف
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالطائف
شركة تنظيف منازل بحفر الباطن
شركة مكافحة حشرات بحفر الباطن